Flowintent / proof
Loading docs
Understand how academy source submission works for every member, the extra review permission teachers hold, and the admin boundary that governs moderating submitted resources.
The academy is shared. Teachers see the same learner experience as any member; what changes with role is permissions, not a separate teacher screen. Any signed-in member can suggest academic sources, and teachers additionally hold the review permission.
Use this guide to understand who can submit sources, where review actually happens, and which moderation surfaces stay behind the admin boundary.
This page belongs to the Learn & Teach section and should be read with the related pages listed at the end.
Use screenshots and notes to explain product behavior without exposing private credentials, admin state, or customer data.
Source submission is a member capability: any signed-in member can suggest articles, papers, courses, and other sources, with enough metadata for editors to evaluate them later. Teachers use the same dialog.
Submitted sources enter an approval queue. Review and publishing happen in the admin console for permission-holders. Teachers carry the review permission, but the review UI itself is admin-gated, so review is an expectation rather than a self-serve screen under the academy.
Keep student lists, admin moderation state, and private review notes out of any shared screenshot.
Search papers, articles, videos, courses, and source previews while preserving progress and metadata.
Understand learner progress, modules, credential status, daily activity, and mobile academy behavior.
Understand provider credential boundaries, reviewer-safe shares, role isolation, and safe documentation capture.